Close

Counts of Mechanical, External Configurations Compared to Computational, Internal Configurations in Natural and Artificial Systems

Citation: A. LaViers. “Counts of Mechanical, External Configurations Compared to Computational, Internal Configurations in Natural and Artificial Systems.” PLoS ONE. 14(5): e0215671. 2019.

Abstract: Animal movement encodes information that is meaningfully interpreted by natural counterparts. This is a behavior that roboticists are trying to replicate in artificial systems but that is not well understood even in natural systems. This paper presents a count on the cardinality of a discretized posture space—an aspect of expressivity—of articulated platforms. The paper uses an information-theoretic measure, Shannon entropy, to create observations analogous to Moore’s Law, providing a measure that complements traditional measures of the capacity of robots. This analysis, applied to a variety of natural and artificial systems, shows trends in increasing capacity in both internal and external complexity for natural systems while artificial, robotic systems have increased significantly in the capacity of computational (internal) states but remained more or less constant in mechanical (external) state capacity. The quantitative measure proposed in this paper provides an additional lens through which to compare natural and artificial systems.

Key image:

A plot with x-axis labeled "internal configurations in base 2 (bits)" and y-axis labeled "external configurations in base 2 (bits)" and several animals and robotic platforms, e.g., C. Elegans, humans, Kismet, and Baxter, mapped.
A plot comparing measures of the number of internal and external configurations available to natural and artificial bodies over a period of 15 years. Credit: Amy LaViers